Regarding the samples, I've tried some of them in the past couple of days with an empty local maven repo and there are multiple samples which fail to build due to incorrect relativePath to the parent pom. I'll walk through all of the samples with an empty maven repo and fix the invalid references hopefully this weekend so that it will be ready early next week.
Can Hudson be set to clean it's tuscany artifacts from the local repo before performing a build? On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok so all those version updates are in now so how are we for doing a > release? Would be nice to do some more samples work but its no worse > than beta1 as it is now. It would be good to get a release out this > year, but with the Christmas break coming up we'd have to do it quite > soon to do that, so if we took a branch early next week to get it done > that week would that work? > > ...ant > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:30 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The abdera release vote has passed, i've not finished all the release > > publishing yet but the 1.1.1 artifacts have been copied to the maven > > repository so the axiom updates in Tuscany should be able to happen > > now. > > > > ...ant > > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:54 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, well thanks for trying it, i'll get the abdera release done so at > >> least we can do the Axis2 1.5.3 / Axiom 1.2.10 upgrade. > >> > >> ...ant > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Raymond Feng <cyberf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> The new release of Abdera fixes the Axiom 1.2.10 dependency problem. > But > >>> apparently the issues for the binding-atom-runtime is much deeper than > this > >>> one. It seems the test cases have been disabled for almost one year. > Our > >>> code have changed significantly since then. I didn't find a quick way > to fix > >>> that. One thing I'm considering is to replace Abdera completely with > Apache > >>> Wink which has much nicer support for ATOM/RSS. But it won't make into > the > >>> Beta 2 release though. > >>> I still want to see the release of Abdera 1.1.1 so that we can upgrade > to > >>> Axis2 1.5.3 and Axiom 1.2.10. > >>> Thanks, > >>> Raymond > >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>> Raymond Feng > >>> rf...@apache.org > >>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:43 PM, ant elder wrote: > >>> > >>> The Abdera release artifacts are now available, would you be able to > >>> try them with the local changes you have to verify they work ok? > >>> > >>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/766szspj6sxahg3r > >>> > >>> ...ant > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Raymond Feng <cyberf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I have a bunch of changes locally to upgrade Tuscany to Axis2 1.5.3, > Axiom > >>> > >>> 1.2.10, Wink 1.1.2-incubating, Abdera 1.2 (to be released as the 1.1 > version > >>> > >>> is not working with Axiom 1.2.10) and Jackson 1.6.3 (to be released, > >>> > >>> containing a few fixes I need). I'll let you know the progress as we > go. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Raymond > >>> > >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>> > >>> Raymond Feng > >>> > >>> rf...@apache.org > >>> > >>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >>> > >>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >>> > >>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >>> > >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >>> > >>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:17 AM, ant elder wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Yep sounds good to me. I'll go do some JIRA work. Before we suggested > >>> > >>> starting doing this early December which is next week, is that soon > >>> > >>> enough or does anyone want a bit more time to get something done? > >>> > >>> > >>> OK no objections so lets start getting the release out. > >>> > >>> ...ant > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
