On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
> A regular hudson build of the samples with an empty repo sounds > useful, though i worry it might take quite a long time to run. I'll > set up a test one to see how long it does take. > > I agree, it mustn't be the Hudson build, but any mechanism that prevents from getting tricked by the local repo containing the artifacts already. I'm thinking we can setup this kind of build and run it just before doing a release, it's not necessary on a daily basis. > I have just tried building all the samples from trunk with an empty > repo and it worked ok, how are you building them, from an svn checkout > or from one of the src/bin distribution snapshots? > > svn checkout... take a look at the comet binding sample, it specifies the parent as tuscany-samples with relativePath ../pom.xml. The artifact found one directory level upper is tuscany-sample-binding-comet. Similar things happened with the introduction of the learning-more, running-tuscany etc. directories. So, it has to fail. Does it worth having poms in each and every directory? Wouldn't it be much easier to maintain a single pom at the samples/ directory level to which all the samples point? ...ant > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Florian MOGA <moga....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regarding the samples, I've tried some of them in the past couple of days > > with an empty local maven repo and there are multiple samples which fail > to > > build due to incorrect relativePath to the parent pom. I'll walk through > all > > of the samples with an empty maven repo and fix the invalid references > > hopefully this weekend so that it will be ready early next week. > > Can Hudson be set to clean it's tuscany artifacts from the local repo > before > > performing a build? > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Ok so all those version updates are in now so how are we for doing a > >> release? Would be nice to do some more samples work but its no worse > >> than beta1 as it is now. It would be good to get a release out this > >> year, but with the Christmas break coming up we'd have to do it quite > >> soon to do that, so if we took a branch early next week to get it done > >> that week would that work? > >> > >> ...ant > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:30 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > The abdera release vote has passed, i've not finished all the release > >> > publishing yet but the 1.1.1 artifacts have been copied to the maven > >> > repository so the axiom updates in Tuscany should be able to happen > >> > now. > >> > > >> > ...ant > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:54 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> OK, well thanks for trying it, i'll get the abdera release done so at > >> >> least we can do the Axis2 1.5.3 / Axiom 1.2.10 upgrade. > >> >> > >> >> ...ant > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Raymond Feng <cyberf...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> The new release of Abdera fixes the Axiom 1.2.10 dependency problem. > >> >>> But > >> >>> apparently the issues for the binding-atom-runtime is much deeper > than > >> >>> this > >> >>> one. It seems the test cases have been disabled for almost one year. > >> >>> Our > >> >>> code have changed significantly since then. I didn't find a quick > way > >> >>> to fix > >> >>> that. One thing I'm considering is to replace Abdera completely with > >> >>> Apache > >> >>> Wink which has much nicer support for ATOM/RSS. But it won't make > into > >> >>> the > >> >>> Beta 2 release though. > >> >>> I still want to see the release of Abdera 1.1.1 so that we can > upgrade > >> >>> to > >> >>> Axis2 1.5.3 and Axiom 1.2.10. > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> Raymond > >> >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >> >>> Raymond Feng > >> >>> rf...@apache.org > >> >>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >> >>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >> >>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >> >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >> >>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:43 PM, ant elder wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> The Abdera release artifacts are now available, would you be able to > >> >>> try them with the local changes you have to verify they work ok? > >> >>> > >> >>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/766szspj6sxahg3r > >> >>> > >> >>> ...ant > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Raymond Feng <cyberf...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> I have a bunch of changes locally to upgrade Tuscany to Axis2 1.5.3, > >> >>> Axiom > >> >>> > >> >>> 1.2.10, Wink 1.1.2-incubating, Abdera 1.2 (to be released as the 1.1 > >> >>> version > >> >>> > >> >>> is not working with Axiom 1.2.10) and Jackson 1.6.3 (to be released, > >> >>> > >> >>> containing a few fixes I need). I'll let you know the progress as we > >> >>> go. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> > >> >>> Raymond > >> >>> > >> >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >> >>> > >> >>> Raymond Feng > >> >>> > >> >>> rf...@apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > >> >>> > >> >>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > >> >>> > >> >>> ________________________________________________________________ > >> >>> > >> >>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:17 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Yep sounds good to me. I'll go do some JIRA work. Before we > suggested > >> >>> > >> >>> starting doing this early December which is next week, is that soon > >> >>> > >> >>> enough or does anyone want a bit more time to get something done? > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> OK no objections so lets start getting the release out. > >> >>> > >> >>> ...ant > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > > > > >
