Hi Ingrid,
Maybe we can leave this artifical structure a bit and create
additonial areas of great interest?
It it an artificial structure, or is the structure presented badly?
Maybe someone could make a drawing/sketch/... of how all modules
connect. I'd prefer seeing it in a kind of brick presentation, where
each brick is a separate project. In case of the Graph component, which
has subcomponents Chart/SVG (?)/... I think at this moment the brick
still should be called Graph, but the description/graphic/icon should
inform better about what is worked on within that project (e.g. a small
graph, vector graphic... mixed)... we could also work with some on hover
effect which gives more information about the project. But to get
thinking going, maybe someone, who knows the overall project a lot
better than me, could draw a schema (or refer to a complete schema
already existing) of how the components relate visually?
Yours,
Maarten
--
Maarten Brouwers (murb)
http://www.murb.nl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
