Hi Ingrid, *, On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:57:11PM +0100, Ingrid Halama wrote: > Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:26:39PM +0100, Ingrid Halama wrote: > >[...] > >Yes, that path is too complicated and surely has to be improved, but the > >solution you proposed is not the best one IMHO. > >As other have pointed out, the Products are end-user related. Having a > >Chart-icon there is not a problem, but the page that will be loaded when > >the user clicks that icon should get the end-user related info. (the > >"marketing blabla") > > > Why must this be so? We could offer a page instead that contains the > Marketing Info as well as links to further activities (roadmaps, query > bugs, bug submission, documentation, scripts and addons, development > offers etc. ) all around that feature area.
I didn't oppose to a page that offers both. But the marketing stuff is a must. > Why should someone who is > interested in calc for example search all this different activities on > different pages separated already on the main page? I think the typical > scenario is that someone is intersted in calc first and then he is > intersted in development or bug submission not the other way round. People "interested in calc" by far outnumbers the people "interested in development". So one can turn your argument and ask: Why should someone who is interested in calc be botheres with all that stuff he is not interested in at all? > So why should we force visitors of the OOo pages to leave their natural > path of interest? I never said that. But: Without a page ready to point to, there is no point in asking for a link on the frontpage. You don't point people to a page that reads: "Sorry, under construction" ciao Christian -- NP: Incubus - Redefine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
