If this work would be extended to feature more features vs. which app,
it might become an interesting table. I would remove the imho redundant
Writer-SW, Calc-SC connections (and either mention them directly between
brackets after the application name).
I'm not sure however if we could fit all projects in a 2D table (which
is what I was looking for). If we want to create it a more general
solution (e.g. how to list the URE in this table, while still making
sense?), we might have to look to other ways of presenting...
g.,
Maarten
John McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 22:05 +0000, John McCreesh wrote:
[snip]
You are asking me to:
(a) display my ignorance of the inner workings of OOo :-)
(b) upset people by sending an HTML formatted message :-)
I should have guessed the mail server wouldn't like HTML mail ... try
http://www.mealldubh.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/temp.html
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Maarten Brouwers (murb)
http://www.murb.nl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
