Hi Maarten,

:murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote:
If this work would be extended to feature more features vs. which app, it might become an interesting table. I would remove the imho redundant Writer-SW, Calc-SC connections (and either mention them directly between brackets after the application name).

I'm not sure however if we could fit all projects in a 2D table (which is what I was looking for). If we want to create it a more general solution (e.g. how to list the URE in this table, while still making sense?), we might have to look to other ways of presenting...

Yes I share your doubt about the possibility of putting the relations in a 2D table.

Let me try an example with the chart to show the problem:
Code that supports chart functionality is to extreme different degrees contained in almost all cvs modules, so you can make a cross almost everywhere. -sch or chart2 in future does contain the 'core' chart functionality (nothing else) -xmloff does contain code to load and save charts (but it does contain also Load and Save for many other parts of OpenOffice like Impress or Writer) -sc does contain the filter from and to excel charts, it does contain also the functionality to use charts in calc (but it also contains the core functionality of calc itself) -sw does contain the functionality to use charts in writer (but it also contains the core functionality of writer itself) -sd and svx does contain the functionality to use charts in impress or draw and it also contains the drawing engine that is used by the chart (but it also contains the core functionality of impress and draw and more)

There are many many other modules involved.
It's kind of guessing where to draw the line and stop putting to much detail to the interested reader.

For example would you like to know where the menu entry translation for chart menu entries does happen? That's another module.

Ingrid

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to