Ivan M wrote: > True, but if we can set up the (static) CSS+HTML framework (i.e., the > CSS files and the HTML structure), then it can be 'ported' to Kenai > later.
+1 > And, since Kenai is stalled with no estimated date of > availability, coupled with the developments in OOo's branding, we > can't really wait that long - it's better (IMHO) that we get started > now ... CSS+HTML would also work here and now with the Apache + CVS set up we currently have, in addition to be fairly easy to 'port' to any eventual open source CMS that might turn up. /Lars --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
