On 3/21/08, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And other than that, I seriously doubt it's the VCS that's the issue, > but rather it's supporting 3 (or more) different branches, testing that > the patches work accross all branches, making different patches for > those that don't etc. With a relatively small team of *volunteers* it's > a choice where you spend your resources... > > And I personally think a centralized VCS is much better for projects > with a small core team anyway.
There has already been a lengthy discussion about git vs. svn on other lists within the ASF. So, let's try not to have it here, please. You wouldn't believe how much traffic (unless you're on those lists) that generated. I don't think my INBOX can take it again. :)
