are you mad? *VSS!!!* On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mercurial! > > -igor > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:39 AM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/21/08, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And other than that, I seriously doubt it's the VCS that's the issue, > > > but rather it's supporting 3 (or more) different branches, testing > that > > > the patches work accross all branches, making different patches for > > > those that don't etc. With a relatively small team of *volunteers* > it's > > > a choice where you spend your resources... > > > > > > And I personally think a centralized VCS is much better for projects > > > with a small core team anyway. > > > > There has already been a lengthy discussion about git vs. svn on other > > lists within the ASF. So, let's try not to have it here, please. You > > wouldn't believe how much traffic (unless you're on those lists) that > > generated. I don't think my INBOX can take it again. :) > > >
