mercurial! -igor
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:39 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/21/08, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And other than that, I seriously doubt it's the VCS that's the issue, > > but rather it's supporting 3 (or more) different branches, testing that > > the patches work accross all branches, making different patches for > > those that don't etc. With a relatively small team of *volunteers* it's > > a choice where you spend your resources... > > > > And I personally think a centralized VCS is much better for projects > > with a small core team anyway. > > There has already been a lengthy discussion about git vs. svn on other > lists within the ASF. So, let's try not to have it here, please. You > wouldn't believe how much traffic (unless you're on those lists) that > generated. I don't think my INBOX can take it again. :) >
