+1, what about moving it to an optional package? wicket-tags ?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1, too:
>
> I use it just the way Igor describes. I usually set up a mock html page,
> then <wicket:link> the css and javascript. So I can easily test the page in
> preview mode and in wicket, too.
>
> Once the application evolves I tend to remove <wicket:link> again and
> replace it with ResourceReference inside the pages and base pages.
>
> Let it there, it's really useful. If people tend to be stupid no framework
> on earth will stop them from doing so.
>
> Cheers
> Peter
>
>
> Am 17.11.2008 um 21:06 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>
> -1.
>>
>> this stuff is very useful for linking to css/js/image files. if people
>> want to abuse it, it is their problem. people will find a way to abuse
>> anything though.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> 2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag
>>> <wicket:link> ? :-)
>>>
>>> People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features
>>> will be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to not
>>> freak everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do that.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> # Java
>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new
>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");
>>>
>>> # HTML
>>> <ul wicket:id="menus">
>>> <li><a href="Users.html">Users</a></li>
>>> <li><a href="Departments.html">Departments</a></li>
>>> </ul>
>>>
>>> What do you guys think?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>> "Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s)
>>> destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
>>> podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e
>>> seu sigilo é protegido por
>>> lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente
>>> e apague-a de seu sistema.
>>> Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação,
>>> distribuição, cópia ou uso sem
>>> expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não
>>> refletem, necessariamente,
>>> o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas
>>> autorizadas."
>>>
>>>
>>> "Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above
>>> identified, possibly
>>> containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose
>>> content is protected by law.
>>> In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and
>>> delete it from your system.
>>> Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination,
>>> distribution, copy or use without
>>> express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do
>>> not necessarily reflect
>>> CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
>>>
>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
