Would the user have to register the plugin manually or would it be
picked up merely by the jar being on the classpath?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is already all pluggable and wicketlink handler is just a plugin
> into the parser :)
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The markup parser has to know how to deal with it I would think. That
>> would be quite an undertaking to split that functionality out and make
>> it able to be plugged back in.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> +1, what about moving it to an optional package? wicket-tags ?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -1, too:
>>>>
>>>> I use it just the way Igor describes. I usually set up a mock html page,
>>>> then <wicket:link> the css and javascript. So I can easily test the page in
>>>> preview mode and in wicket, too.
>>>>
>>>> Once the application evolves I tend to remove <wicket:link> again and
>>>> replace it with ResourceReference inside the pages and base pages.
>>>>
>>>> Let it there, it's really useful. If people tend to be stupid no framework
>>>> on earth will stop them from doing so.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.11.2008 um 21:06 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>>>>
>>>> -1.
>>>>>
>>>>> this stuff is very useful for linking to css/js/image files. if people
>>>>> want to abuse it, it is their problem. people will find a way to abuse
>>>>> anything though.
>>>>>
>>>>> -igor
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag
>>>>>> <wicket:link> ? :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features
>>>>>> will be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to not
>>>>>> freak everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Example:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Java
>>>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new
>>>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # HTML
>>>>>> <ul wicket:id="menus">
>>>>>> <li><a href="Users.html">Users</a></li>
>>>>>> <li><a href="Departments.html">Departments</a></li>
>>>>>> </ul>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Bruno
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>>> "Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s)
>>>>>> destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
>>>>>> podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e
>>>>>> seu sigilo é protegido por
>>>>>> lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente
>>>>>> e apague-a de seu sistema.
>>>>>> Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação,
>>>>>> distribuição, cópia ou uso sem
>>>>>> expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não
>>>>>> refletem, necessariamente,
>>>>>> o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas
>>>>>> autorizadas."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above
>>>>>> identified, possibly
>>>>>> containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose
>>>>>> content is protected by law.
>>>>>> In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and
>>>>>> delete it from your system.
>>>>>> Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination,
>>>>>> distribution, copy or use without
>>>>>> express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do
>>>>>> not necessarily reflect
>>>>>> CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
