The markup parser has to know how to deal with it I would think. That
would be quite an undertaking to split that functionality out and make
it able to be plugged back in.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, what about moving it to an optional package? wicket-tags ?
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -1, too:
>>
>> I use it just the way Igor describes. I usually set up a mock html page,
>> then <wicket:link> the css and javascript. So I can easily test the page in
>> preview mode and in wicket, too.
>>
>> Once the application evolves I tend to remove <wicket:link> again and
>> replace it with ResourceReference inside the pages and base pages.
>>
>> Let it there, it's really useful. If people tend to be stupid no framework
>> on earth will stop them from doing so.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 17.11.2008 um 21:06 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>>
>> -1.
>>>
>>> this stuff is very useful for linking to css/js/image files. if people
>>> want to abuse it, it is their problem. people will find a way to abuse
>>> anything though.
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> 2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>>> This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag
>>>> <wicket:link> ? :-)
>>>>
>>>> People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features
>>>> will be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to not
>>>> freak everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Example:
>>>>
>>>> # Java
>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new
>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");
>>>>
>>>> # HTML
>>>> <ul wicket:id="menus">
>>>> <li><a href="Users.html">Users</a></li>
>>>> <li><a href="Departments.html">Departments</a></li>
>>>> </ul>
>>>>
>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Bruno
>>>>
>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>> "Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s)
>>>> destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
>>>> podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e
>>>> seu sigilo é protegido por
>>>> lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente
>>>> e apague-a de seu sistema.
>>>> Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação,
>>>> distribuição, cópia ou uso sem
>>>> expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não
>>>> refletem, necessariamente,
>>>> o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas
>>>> autorizadas."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above
>>>> identified, possibly
>>>> containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose
>>>> content is protected by law.
>>>> In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and
>>>> delete it from your system.
>>>> Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination,
>>>> distribution, copy or use without
>>>> express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do
>>>> not necessarily reflect
>>>> CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
>>>>
>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
