That's my opinion, also. I voted -1 to removing wicket:link. I was
more just curious about the inner workings of the parser at this point
:)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the problem with just leaving it where it is?
>
> If you don't like it ignore it - or am I missing something important here?
>
> Am 18.11.2008 um 22:12 schrieb James Carman:
>
>> Would the user have to register the plugin manually or would it be
>> picked up merely by the jar being on the classpath?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> it is already all pluggable and wicketlink handler is just a plugin
>>> into the parser :)
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM, James Carman
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The markup parser has to know how to deal with it I would think. That
>>>> would be quite an undertaking to split that functionality out and make
>>>> it able to be plugged back in.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, what about moving it to an optional package? wicket-tags ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -1, too:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I use it just the way Igor describes. I usually set up a mock html
>>>>>> page,
>>>>>> then <wicket:link> the css and javascript. So I can easily test the
>>>>>> page in
>>>>>> preview mode and in wicket, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once the application evolves I tend to remove <wicket:link> again and
>>>>>> replace it with ResourceReference inside the pages and base pages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let it there, it's really useful. If people tend to be stupid no
>>>>>> framework
>>>>>> on earth will stop them from doing so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.11.2008 um 21:06 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this stuff is very useful for linking to css/js/image files. if
>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>> want to abuse it, it is their problem. people will find a way to
>>>>>>> abuse
>>>>>>> anything though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -igor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the
>>>>>>>> tag
>>>>>>>> <wicket:link> ? :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that,
>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>> will be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> freak everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do
>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Example:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # Java
>>>>>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new
>>>>>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # HTML
>>>>>>>> <ul wicket:id="menus">
>>>>>>>> <li><a href="Users.html">Users</a></li>
>>>>>>>> <li><a href="Departments.html">Departments</a></li>
>>>>>>>> </ul>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Bruno
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>>>>> "Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s)
>>>>>>>> destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
>>>>>>>> podendo conter informações e/ou documentos
>>>>>>>> confidencias/privilegiados e
>>>>>>>> seu sigilo é protegido por
>>>>>>>> lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o
>>>>>>>> remetente
>>>>>>>> e apague-a de seu sistema.
>>>>>>>> Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação,
>>>>>>>> distribuição, cópia ou uso sem
>>>>>>>> expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente
>>>>>>>> não
>>>>>>>> refletem, necessariamente,
>>>>>>>> o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas
>>>>>>>> autorizadas."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees
>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>> identified, possibly
>>>>>>>> containing information and or privileged/confidential documents
>>>>>>>> whose
>>>>>>>> content is protected by law.
>>>>>>>> In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> delete it from your system.
>>>>>>>> Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination,
>>>>>>>> distribution, copy or use without
>>>>>>>> express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the
>>>>>>>> sender do
>>>>>>>> not necessarily reflect
>>>>>>>> CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized
>>>>>>>> personnel."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
