it is already all pluggable and wicketlink handler is just a plugin
into the parser :)
-igor
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The markup parser has to know how to deal with it I would think. That
> would be quite an undertaking to split that functionality out and make
> it able to be plugged back in.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Rodolfo Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1, what about moving it to an optional package? wicket-tags ?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> -1, too:
>>>
>>> I use it just the way Igor describes. I usually set up a mock html page,
>>> then <wicket:link> the css and javascript. So I can easily test the page in
>>> preview mode and in wicket, too.
>>>
>>> Once the application evolves I tend to remove <wicket:link> again and
>>> replace it with ResourceReference inside the pages and base pages.
>>>
>>> Let it there, it's really useful. If people tend to be stupid no framework
>>> on earth will stop them from doing so.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.11.2008 um 21:06 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>>>
>>> -1.
>>>>
>>>> this stuff is very useful for linking to css/js/image files. if people
>>>> want to abuse it, it is their problem. people will find a way to abuse
>>>> anything though.
>>>>
>>>> -igor
>>>>
>>>> 2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>
>>>>> This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag
>>>>> <wicket:link> ? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features
>>>>> will be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to not
>>>>> freak everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Example:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Java
>>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new
>>>>> AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");
>>>>>
>>>>> # HTML
>>>>> <ul wicket:id="menus">
>>>>> <li><a href="Users.html">Users</a></li>
>>>>> <li><a href="Departments.html">Departments</a></li>
>>>>> </ul>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Bruno
>>>>>
>>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>> "Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s)
>>>>> destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
>>>>> podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e
>>>>> seu sigilo é protegido por
>>>>> lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente
>>>>> e apague-a de seu sistema.
>>>>> Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação,
>>>>> distribuição, cópia ou uso sem
>>>>> expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não
>>>>> refletem, necessariamente,
>>>>> o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas
>>>>> autorizadas."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above
>>>>> identified, possibly
>>>>> containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose
>>>>> content is protected by law.
>>>>> In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and
>>>>> delete it from your system.
>>>>> Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination,
>>>>> distribution, copy or use without
>>>>> express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do
>>>>> not necessarily reflect
>>>>> CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
>>>>>
>>>>> ***************************************************************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
