Oops - forgot link:

[1] - http://www.symfony-project.org/

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Yes - I agree.  I think that would be the next step.  I've been doing some
> work on a PHP site lately - which at first I thought I was going to hate.
> But everyone at that company only knew PHP - so I chose to go with Symfony
> [1] - and I've enjoyed it. Anyway, the point is - they have a great floating
> toolbar at the top right of the screen in development mode that gives you
> each query that was run, logging output for that request, timing for
> different cycles of the request, etc.  It's great.
>
> I'd love to build something like it that would allow you to register
> various contributors to add different details to the debug bar.
>
> But I think that the proposal below is sort of the first step towards that.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> martijn and matej and i talked about having a floating console that
>> can be enabled at runtime and that would host all these kinds of
>> tools. so basically extending or  encorporating our existing ajax
>> console into something much more powerful. seems like if we move away
>> from having these tools as pages and making them panels we can create
>> a console.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Please review WICKET-670 [1] and give your input.  The idea is basically
>> > that we want to be able to use the inspector bug and associated
>> > development-time utilities in our applications.  Currently, the
>> inspector
>> > bug is built into wicket-examples, which builds as a war, which makes it
>> > difficult to include in your app.  We just added the @StatelessComponent
>> > annotation and associated checker to wicket-core which is meant for
>> > development time error catching.
>> >
>> > I'm proposing that we:
>> >
>> >   - Create subpackage wicket-devutils (by subpackage, I mean a maven
>> >   submodule, etc, similar to wicket-extensions - lives as a folder in
>> the
>> >   wicket core tree)
>> >   - In it, put the inspector page(s), inspector bug and related utilties
>> as
>> >   well as the new @StatelessComponent
>> >   - Add to it a common place that all such dev utilities get their
>> on/off
>> >   switch (which will read from application's debug settings, perhaps)
>> >   - Enable it in dev by default, off in prod by default, but have a way
>> >   that it can be enabled in production (by setting the value in debug
>> >   settings)
>> >   - As Jon suggested - the pages will throw an exception if they are
>> >   accessed and are disabled at the time.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thoughts?  I'd like to get this done in the 1.4 release so that it's
>> > available to all those who pick up Wicket in the next year while we're
>> > working on 1.5.
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-670
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jeremy Thomerson
>> > http://www.wickettraining.com
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to