That's a plan!
Sven
Am 07.10.2017 um 18:16 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
Sure we should! But I'd like not to break the build when we will merge
(hopefully soon) WICKET-6105. After we have merged it we will have all the
time to migrate the code to the new extensions module.
On Oct 7, 2017 5:32 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
This make sense :)
I'll try to find some time and check some of these modules
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
Hi,
IMHO we should set a good example by migrating these modules to use the
new
classes in wicket-extensions.
We don't want to provide support for wicket-datetime forever, do we?
Regards
Sven
Am 07.10.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
Hi,
WicketStuff is currently depending on Wicket 'wicket-datetime' for three
subprojects:
- wicket-scala
- inmethod-grid
- wicketstuff-portlet-examples
I think we should replace it with the corresponding module we have
migrated to WicketStuff.
What do you think?
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
