On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> build is successful ....
> That's weird ...
>

Why it's wired :) ? Before the merge I switched the wicket-datetime
dependency to the namesake module we have migrated to WicketStuff.

will try to manually update the dependencies for one of the modules
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > WICKET-6105 was merged :))
> > I'm checking wicketstuff build :)
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >
> >> That's a plan!
> >>
> >> Sven
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 07.10.2017 um 18:16 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
> >>
> >>> Sure we should! But I'd like not to break the build when we will merge
> >>> (hopefully soon) WICKET-6105. After we have merged it we will have all
> >>> the
> >>> time to migrate the code to the new extensions module.
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 7, 2017 5:32 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This make sense :)
> >>>> I'll try to find some time and check some of these modules
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMHO we should set a good example by migrating these modules to use
> the
> >>>>>
> >>>> new
> >>>>
> >>>>> classes in wicket-extensions.
> >>>>> We don't want to provide support for wicket-datetime forever, do we?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Sven
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 07.10.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WicketStuff is currently depending on Wicket 'wicket-datetime' for
> >>>>>> three
> >>>>>> subprojects:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - wicket-scala
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - inmethod-grid
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - wicketstuff-portlet-examples
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think we should replace it with the corresponding module we have
> >>>>>> migrated to WicketStuff.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> WBR
> >>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Reply via email to