I have updated wicketstuff-portlet-examples so now it is 1) Uses examples from latest wicket 2) jetty:run works without errors
BUT :)) examples are really weird, jetty only displays directory listing :( can some-one double check this? + it seems like this module has copy of wicket-examples module, which is really weird .... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > build is successful .... > That's weird ... > will try to manually update the dependencies for one of the modules > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> WICKET-6105 was merged :)) >> I'm checking wicketstuff build :) >> >> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That's a plan! >>> >>> Sven >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 07.10.2017 um 18:16 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: >>> >>>> Sure we should! But I'd like not to break the build when we will merge >>>> (hopefully soon) WICKET-6105. After we have merged it we will have all >>>> the >>>> time to migrate the code to the new extensions module. >>>> >>>> On Oct 7, 2017 5:32 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This make sense :) >>>>> I'll try to find some time and check some of these modules >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> IMHO we should set a good example by migrating these modules to use >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>> new >>>>> >>>>>> classes in wicket-extensions. >>>>>> We don't want to provide support for wicket-datetime forever, do we? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Sven >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 07.10.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WicketStuff is currently depending on Wicket 'wicket-datetime' for >>>>>>> three >>>>>>> subprojects: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - wicket-scala >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - inmethod-grid >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - wicketstuff-portlet-examples >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we should replace it with the corresponding module we have >>>>>>> migrated to WicketStuff. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
