I have updated wicketstuff-portlet-examples so now it is
1) Uses examples from latest wicket
2) jetty:run works without errors

BUT :))

examples are really weird, jetty only displays directory listing :( can
some-one double check this?
+ it seems like this module has copy of wicket-examples module, which is
really weird ....

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> build is successful ....
> That's weird ...
> will try to manually update the dependencies for one of the modules
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> WICKET-6105 was merged :))
>> I'm checking wicketstuff build :)
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>
>>> That's a plan!
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.10.2017 um 18:16 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>>>
>>>> Sure we should! But I'd like not to break the build when we will merge
>>>> (hopefully soon) WICKET-6105. After we have merged it we will have all
>>>> the
>>>> time to migrate the code to the new extensions module.
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 7, 2017 5:32 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This make sense :)
>>>>> I'll try to find some time and check some of these modules
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMHO we should set a good example by migrating these modules to use
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>> new
>>>>>
>>>>>> classes in wicket-extensions.
>>>>>> We don't want to provide support for wicket-datetime forever, do we?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 07.10.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WicketStuff is currently depending on Wicket 'wicket-datetime' for
>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>> subprojects:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - wicket-scala
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - inmethod-grid
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - wicketstuff-portlet-examples
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we should replace it with the corresponding module we have
>>>>>>> migrated to WicketStuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to