I thought build failed is expected :)) Will try to remove this dependency to wicket-datetime, and perform migration :)
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> wrote: > I mean weird :-D > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> build is successful .... > >> That's weird ... > >> > > > > Why it's wired :) ? Before the merge I switched the wicket-datetime > > dependency to the namesake module we have migrated to WicketStuff. > > > > will try to manually update the dependencies for one of the modules > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > WICKET-6105 was merged :)) > >> > I'm checking wicketstuff build :) > >> > > >> > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> That's a plan! > >> >> > >> >> Sven > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Am 07.10.2017 um 18:16 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: > >> >> > >> >>> Sure we should! But I'd like not to break the build when we will > merge > >> >>> (hopefully soon) WICKET-6105. After we have merged it we will have > all > >> >>> the > >> >>> time to migrate the code to the new extensions module. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Oct 7, 2017 5:32 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> This make sense :) > >> >>>> I'll try to find some time and check some of these modules > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> IMHO we should set a good example by migrating these modules to > use > >> the > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> new > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> classes in wicket-extensions. > >> >>>>> We don't want to provide support for wicket-datetime forever, do > we? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Regards > >> >>>>> Sven > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Am 07.10.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> WicketStuff is currently depending on Wicket 'wicket-datetime' > for > >> >>>>>> three > >> >>>>>> subprojects: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> - wicket-scala > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> - inmethod-grid > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> - wicketstuff-portlet-examples > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I think we should replace it with the corresponding module we > have > >> >>>>>> migrated to WicketStuff. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> What do you think? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -- > >> >>>> WBR > >> >>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > WBR > >> > Maxim aka solomax > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> WBR > >> Maxim aka solomax > >> > > > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
