On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
Compat package prepared.

Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides:

/usr/bin/autoconf269
/usr/bin/autoheader269
/usr/bin/autom4te269
/usr/bin/autoreconf269
/usr/bin/autoscan269
/usr/bin/autoupdate269
/usr/bin/ifnames269
...

Parallel installation successful.

Any suggestions/concerns are welcome.

My concerns are:

1) Why 269 and not 2.69?
2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different names?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to