On 03. 03. 21 13:47, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com
<mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Compat package prepared.
>
> Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides:
>
> /usr/bin/autoconf269
> /usr/bin/autoheader269
> /usr/bin/autom4te269
> /usr/bin/autoreconf269
> /usr/bin/autoscan269
> /usr/bin/autoupdate269
> /usr/bin/ifnames269
> ...
>
> Parallel installation successful.
>
> Any suggestions/concerns are welcome.
My concerns are:
1) Why 269 and not 2.69?
Just a naming convention, if needed can be easily changed
There is no need to complicate stuff by removing the dot. The naming convention
for compat packages is to include the version:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple
2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different names?
It is up to us to discuss this.
How are most of the packages in Fedora using? Is it spelling out "autoconf" in
the spec file, or trough some configure scripts? If it is the second, I worry
that a command will mean patching (or sedding) would be required.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
