Thanks for your notes. If wanted, the first version of autoconf2.69-2.69 compat package is available in copr for testing. This is a version which is parallelly installable with autoconf-2.71. Please check/update your packages and rebuild them.
Thanks. Regards, Ondrej copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/odubaj/autoconf-2.70/packages/ On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 2:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > 1) Why 269 and not 2.69? > > I guess that this is a historical thing: past autoconf compatibility > packages always had names such as autoconf213. Back then, dots in package > names were considered unusual or harmful, standard practice was to omit > them. The rule that the dot should be included was added relatively > recently > (but already a couple years ago by now) to the packaging guidelines. > > Kevin Kofler > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
