On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > Compat package prepared. > > > > Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: > > > > /usr/bin/autoconf269 > > /usr/bin/autoheader269 > > /usr/bin/autom4te269 > > /usr/bin/autoreconf269 > > /usr/bin/autoscan269 > > /usr/bin/autoupdate269 > > /usr/bin/ifnames269 > > ... > > > > Parallel installation successful. > > > > Any suggestions/concerns are welcome. > > My concerns are: > > 1) Why 269 and not 2.69? > Just a naming convention, if needed can be easily changed 2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different names? > It is up to us to discuss this. > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
