On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:51 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03. 03. 21 13:47, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com > > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > Compat package prepared. > > > > > > Package autoconf269-2.69-1 provides: > > > > > > /usr/bin/autoconf269 > > > /usr/bin/autoheader269 > > > /usr/bin/autom4te269 > > > /usr/bin/autoreconf269 > > > /usr/bin/autoscan269 > > > /usr/bin/autoupdate269 > > > /usr/bin/ifnames269 > > > ... > > > > > > Parallel installation successful. > > > > > > Any suggestions/concerns are welcome. > > > > My concerns are: > > > > 1) Why 269 and not 2.69? > > > > Just a naming convention, if needed can be easily changed > > There is no need to complicate stuff by removing the dot. The naming > convention > for compat packages is to include the version: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple Ok, will change immediately. > > > > 2) Is the parallel installability worth the trouble of different > names? > > > > It is up to us to discuss this. > > How are most of the packages in Fedora using? Is it spelling out > "autoconf" in > the spec file, or trough some configure scripts? If it is the second, I > worry > that a command will mean patching (or sedding) would be required. > Both, actually. > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
