On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:27 AM Ondrej Dubaj <odu...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions, but as you might understand, I do not have 
> the capacity to resolve problems of dependent packages when building with 
> autoconf-2.71.
>
> I can only prepare autoconf-2.71 and compat package autoconf2.69-2.69 for 
> other maintainers, so they are able to make appropriate changes and test them 
> in copr. Testing is possible by pushing the changes to a new created branch 
> "rawhide-autoconf-2.71", where in your package you can use autoconf 
> dependency (autoconf-2.71) or autoconf2.69 dependency (compat package for 
> autoconf-2.69). After pushing to the given branch, the package will be built 
> automatically in copr and you can test the update of your package. You can do 
> this many times until you are certain your package works good.
>
> Thanks for understanding and cooperation.

Please don't do branches like this in "official" dist-git
repositories. It's a big PITA to clean up such branches.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to