Hi Johann, On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Johann Fischer <johann_fisc...@posteo.de> wrote: > > Am Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:44:57 +0100 > schrieb Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr>: > > > Hey Kaspar! > > > > > If RIOT is BSD'ed, for *me* personally time spent on it is not fun > > > time I like to in my unpaid spare time anymore, it becomes work > > > that is also fun. Work others can (and will) sell under their terms. > > > > I totally don't get this point. How do more possibilities to work > > with RIOT for *others*, take fun away from *you*? > > > > > (L)GPL guarantees that my contribution will stay part of something > > > that might improve, but is always available to me under clear > > > tearms. > > > > I disagree. The RIOT community guarantees that your and everyone > > else's contribution stay part of open and free software that might > > improve. Additionally, it might become part of something else, true. > > > I agree with Kaspar. Also as a company we have interests that if a > competitor uses our work, it would be forced to admit changes or > improvements back. > >
OK. So is LGPLv2 indeed aligned with your company's policy and legal department? That would be interesting to know for this discussion. Best, Emmanuel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
