Hi, I'm not in favor of keeping the prefix. Three reasons: 1. https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2731#discussion_r27350056 2. I'm really looking forward to the day when I don't need to prepend the ng_ prefix anymore 3. "Angie" sounds to me like a political statement ;-)
In all seriousness: I think Ludwigs proposal is better. Cheers, Martine 2015-05-03 2:04 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr>: > Hi! > > > > What do you think? > > > > Due to its known meaning "ng" is as bad a name as "new" or "next", > > because it will loose this meaning in the foreseeable future. > > Star Trek TNG hasn't lost its meaning even after twenty years... But I'm > really not in favor of any particular name. > > > I'm not sure if naming is necessary at all. I think public/shared > > headers can be used without a problem, and non-default implementations > > (I assume the current "ng" implementation will be the default) > > can as well get a characterizing suffix like "_light" or "_tiny" if > > and when they arrive. > > As long as there are only headers to be shared, no problem, but for > functions > it's getting more complicated. > > Cheers, > Oleg > -- > /* When we have more time, we can teach the penguin to say > * "By your command" or "Activating turbo boost, Michael". > */ > linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc/prom/sun4prom.c > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
