Hi Oleg,
2015-05-03 12:59 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr>: > > > I'm not in favor of keeping the prefix. Three reasons: > > Forget about the ng, that's unrelated to the question that we need a name > for > the stack. > As stated in the previous e-mail: > In all seriousness: I think Ludwigs proposal is better. In other words: the new stack will be the default one, while smaller implementations can be called `tiny_`, `micro_` or whatever. The proposed architecture, that other implementations can use `ipv6/hdr.h`, `ipv6/addr.h` or similar is mostly in place already.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
