On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Jason Kitcat <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > On 16 Mar 2012, at 13:56, Martin Keegan wrote:
>> In the Brighton case, it's also probably fixable: Jason, how hard >> would it be to get the council to change its practice? > > > Further to this thread, the FOI team have now reviewed their processes and > found the problem. Their mental model assumed that WDTK assigned a unique > email address to each user, not to each request. So they used the first > address they got for each WDTK user. > > They know understand how it works and will ensure the unique email address > for each request is used from now on. > > Let me know if any further problems arise. Thanks Jason; hopefully it's sorted out now. Mk _______________________________________________ developers-public mailing list [email protected] https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public Unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com
