On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:37:19AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 11 de março de 2013 07.41.02, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > > Jens claimed on the blog that the native look and feel matters less in the > > mobile world because each app is fullscreen. I agree that it matters less, > > but I disagree that it matters little enough for us to ignore it. I'd much > > rather use real iOS-looking controls than simply slap on Fusion. > > The whole point is that you shouldn't use QtWidgets at all on mobile > platforms. Just don't. Why not? I agree that QtQuick is usually the way to go for implementing mobile UI, but that doesn't exclude QtWidgets for any reasons a developer may wish to use it. When we did the BlackBerry port, we did implement a BlackBerry style, which could achieve native look and feel decently. This comes really handy when you are porting apps from the desktop. I think implementing a native iOS style wouldn't be hard. I don't know much about iOS development, but if what Jake says about being able to render controls to off-screen buffers, then it should be completely feasible. Of course, even better would be a set of QML components, but these are not mutually exclusive approaches. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Rafael Roquetto | [email protected] | Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
