On quarta-feira, 13 de março de 2013 00.51.05, André Pönitz wrote: > I'll try hard to abstain from anything resembling irony or sarcasm. > I just want to carry on this theoretical discussion based on purely > hypothetical facts. > > I'd ask you kindly to either read all, or nothing.
Hi André Without agreeing or disagreeing to your arguments, nor even emitting an opinion on them, let's just take them for granted and analyse the situation. If you're right, we need a powerful C++ API for doing what currently can only be done in QML and is being proposed to be done only in QML. I'm arguing we have no such API (read: it's not QtWidgets!). So we have two options: create and develop it, or not. The question is: if we need to implement it, do we need to implement it before the QML API? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
