On segunda-feira, 11 de março de 2013 16.54.31, Rafael Roquetto wrote: > Why not? I agree that QtQuick is usually the way to go for implementing > mobile UI, but that doesn't exclude QtWidgets for any reasons a developer > may wish to use it. When we did the BlackBerry port, we did implement a > BlackBerry style, which could achieve native look and feel decently. This > comes really handy when you are porting apps from the desktop.
> I think implementing a native iOS style wouldn't be hard. I don't know much > about iOS development, but if what Jake says about being able to render > controls to off-screen buffers, then it should be completely feasible. That will give you the right static look, but not the feel. In order to implement the right feel, with animations, shadows, etc., you need a lot more. If things glow, slide, bounce, it will be extremely hard to implement with QtWidgets. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
