On 16/12/03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] did say: > So what constitutes a working SME system is not ALL going to be released into > open-source AND you are considering parts of SME and/or Red Hat as LGPL in > some cases to make this determination.
*blink* 1. smeserver 6.0 unsupported works fine. The 6000 MAS + blades works better. 2. We need not "consider" packages from RedHat as having any particular license. The license in each and every case is very clearly stated. Assuming that every package from RedHat is licensed under the GPL, we are free to build upon those packages without releasing that code, as long as we do not modify that code. Any modifications to GPL'd code have been released, and will continued to be released upon request. However, as Charlie so clearly pointed out, we are _not_ required to release any of our proprietary work. You have a clear misunderstanding of the nature of the GPL, and I suggest you follow Charlie's suggestion and go read it again. Regards, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 613-592-2122 x2522 6000/6010/60* Development, Mitel Networks Corporation "...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount of nerd-like effort." -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
