On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:16:36PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > You don't want fred to have to compete with code that is running > > > > continuous FEC decoding in the same JVM. Perhaps your machine is so > > > > powerful that you haven't noticed, but we can't get fred to run with > > > > reasonable CPU usage *all by itself*. > > If you really care so passionately about "streaming", what about doing some > > work to figure out what's going on with CPU usage? > > ??? Stop trying to change the subject. > > > I don't appreciate your tone and ad hominum attacks. > > Ad hominum? Give me one example of where I made an ad hominum attack. > And my "tone" is no different to yours. > > > I have limited time to devote to this project and the amount that I would > > waste engaging in this kind of debate is directly subtracted from it. > > Noted. Nobody please disagree with GJ from now on since unlike anyone > else on this project, he is a busy person and doesn't have time to > justify his claims. > > > All I meant is that when the FCP server is overwhelmed, it can stop answering > > requests. > > The bottleneck is much more likely to be the connection to the Internet > than the FCP connection over the local loopback. The bottleneck is the inefficiency of the Fred code. If it is swamped with requests, it will overload and stop being useful to either clients or the network. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/RMMHBxLOISw/ ICTHUS.
msg06411/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
