On Dec 12, 2007 8:41 AM, Julien Cornuwel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Toseland a écrit :
>
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 10:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Well. For my personal taste it is necessary to be technical to a degree.
> >> To propose to use "Freenet" for everything is not correct.
> >>
> >> There is
> >> - the "Freenet Project" - the overall project, just like "Mozilla
> > Firefox", "Microsoft Windows", etc.
> >> - the "Freenet" - the network and it's structure - like "the Internet"
> >> - the "Freenet", again - as the complete concept how the network shall work
> >> - the "node" - a more theoretical descrition of a participant, a
> > singe "point", of and within the network
> >> - the node's implementation "FRED" ("Freenet REference Daemon") - the java
> > program within the .jar, that, when run, provides functionalies of a node
> >> - the node's HTTP-user interface "FProxy" - to browse freesites, enter
> >> other
> > node/FRED references, see statistics, etc.
> >> and you want to smush everything together to a single term "Freenet" ?!!
> >
> > No, in this case it is being used as "the application Freenet", which is
> > quite
> > specific and reasonably obvious to the user.
I agree.
Remember - This is possibly a users first contact with Freenet. As
users get deeper in and more exposed they will learn the technical
terminology.
This needs to be as simple and clear as possible.
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
