Matthew Toseland skrev: > On Thursday 21 May 2009 17:32:55 Juiceman wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 <ze...@zerosplayground.dk> wrote: >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: >>>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote: >>>>> Matthew Toseland skrev: >>>>>>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at >>>>>>> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be >>>>>>> registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already >>>>>>> for the individual browsers. We can also check the version info of .exes >>>>>>> as an alternative (most Windows applications are compiled with various >>>>>>> static info like version and author). The Windows launcher is already >>>>>>> running Chrome with a command line argument making it start in privacy >>>>>>> mode btw. >>>>>> You should prioritise Chrome with privacy mode over Firefox without it. >>>>> Agreed: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3118. >>>> I thought you had already done this? >>> At time of writing, no. But since then I managed to figure git out and >>> changed it (hence the bug is now "resolved"). >>> >>> ... which leads to another thing to consider: We need to make it >>> possible to update the start.exe/stop.exe/freenetlauncher.exe files for >>> existing users when new updates are made available. >>> >>> The easiest way to do this right now would probably be to add them to >>> the update.cmd script. >>> >>> - Zero3 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devl mailing list >>> Devl@freenetproject.org >>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >>> >> I would be happy to do this, however I will need a defined directory >> structure on the download site, with known file names. Like we have >> the .url link for the freenet.jar. I believe I can use the .sha1 file >> to check for updates if you want to have a static name. ie >> wrapper_win32x86.exe etc. Also I would prefer to not have them inside >> a zip unless we have have a built-in unzipping program in Windows I >> can reliably call by command line. Otherwise we will have to bundle >> yet another third party utility. > > Well, they should be fetched from > http[s]://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/<filename>, not from > downloads... are the relevant files currently available from checksums?
I don't know if they are? I never had anything to do with the actual uploading of the files to anywhere on freenetproject.org. - Zero3 _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
