On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:42:38 schrieb Ian: > > I'm not opposed to using signing if we can do it without keeping the > > project stuck in 2001's development tools - because that will pretty-much > > guarantee its slow death. > > Are we actually stuck in 2001’s development tools? > When it comes to dependency management, yes. Maven started in 2002, and has become standard in the years since. There might be some tools which are not up to date, but that’s either > because no one took it up, or because the benefit does not outweight > the cost (we have to update all contributors to the new system, and we > have quite diverse development setups). > There are more important things to do — like getting the debian > package working again. And for that, using proven though sometimes a > bit clunky systems is an advantage. I'd say a higher priority would be making Freenet look remotely like a modern piece of software. So many aspects of Freenet seem like a time capsule from over a decade ago. Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
