I'm not proposing that we bundle Tor, that this replace the existing UDP transport, nor that it become a typical mode of operation. I'm pointing out a possible use of a TCP transport plugin. I'm also not suggesting we do a whole bunch of Tor-specific discovery/routing work like Matthew mentioned. The initial use case is limited to darknet connections between hidden services.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015, 10:39 AM Ian <i...@locut.us> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> > wrote: > > > > While it's true that we can't exactly "leave the anonymity to Tor," I do > > think we could be able to make use of Tor. If we can get a TCP transport > > plugin working people can set up a node as a hidden service and reduce > > the visibility of running a node. > > > If we were getting a lot of complaints about Freenet being too fast, too > easy to install, too easy to use, or not bloated enough, then bundling Tor > would be a great way to solve all of these complaints. > > Otherwise, it still seems like a really awful idea. > > Ian. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl@freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
