On 10/16/2015 11:13 AM, Ian wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, <salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com> > wrote: ... >> I'm questioning if the overhead of designing and maintaining yet another >> anonymity protocol makes sense given Freenet's current situation. You can >> concentrate on polishing Freenet UX and storage algorithms instead and >> leave the anonymity to Tor. > > > As I already said in my previous email, that is nonsense. Freenet's > "anonymity" is at the core of what Freenet is. You can't just "unplug" the > anonymity and plug Tor in in it's place. It doesn't work like that.
While it's true that we can't exactly "leave the anonymity to Tor," I do think we could be able to make use of Tor. If we can get a TCP transport plugin working people can set up a node as a hidden service and reduce the visibility of running a node.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
