>I'm pretty sure that isn't true. Not only does it not make any sense >whatsoever, but I can't find anything to back that up. Can you support >that claim?
>That's not true. Both proven: http://youtube-global.blogspot.de/2011/03/were-turning-off-our-lights-in-honor-of.html > Yeah, that's about as convincing as your previous arguments, one of which is > almost certainly factually incorrect, and the other is definitely factually > incorrect. Superficially and without actually dealing with it a little bit deeper simply claiming an argument to be not convincing and pushing it close to factual incorrectness is a knockout argument, and rather reveals insistence on being right disquised as factual argumentation, than being valuable for getting a discourse forward. Greetings, Torben Lechner _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
