On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:38 PM, xor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Together with the idea "a darknet-thing should have a dark website to make > users feel like they did find the darknet", I'd hope we can move on to > working > on other stuff for a while? >
I can't agree. The research tells us that light on dark is bad. We've had direct feedback on the current design supporting this. We also have the fact that not a single popular website uses a light on dark color scheme. I really don't think there can be any doubt that a light-on-dark color scheme is hurting, not helping us. My personal opinion is that there are critical problems with the website as it stands right now, and I don't think we can afford to bury our heads in the sand about it. Yes, I admit that most of these problems I could and should have pointed out earlier, but that doesn't change the fact that they are valid concerns. Make no mistake, a bad website will kill our project. There's lots of things to do, we don't need to get stuck on trying to get > one > thing perfect, better improve all a bit. For example the next logical step > would be to revamp the Freenet web interface theme to look less ancient as > well. > I hate to say it, but I'm really starting to think that, while the previous website wasn't good, the current website might be worse, and we would have a much much better website if we had just stuck to the default Bootstrap CSS (which is what most people do). Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
