All I'm saying is: 1. One has good things to look at, neutral things to look at, and bad things to look at. 2. One should look at all, but it's important to have a balance between all. Only focussing on bad things drags you down.
Greetings, Tobias Lechner --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Ian <i...@locut.us> Datum: 06.01.2016 16:12:48 An: hyazin...@emailn.de, Discussion of development issues <devl@freenetproject.org> Betreff: Re: [freenet-dev] What blocks Freenet adoption? On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:28 AM, <hyazin...@emailn.de> wrote: I second Steve's statement. We've done enough 'looking what all is bad' stuff in recent past, people already know what's wrong, that's enough. Keep doing it - even when done in a very friendly and nice tone - just demotivates and that highens unproductivity. I've never heard of a project that didn't try to maintain a clear idea of what the project's priorities should be. Are you saying that we already have a comprehensive list of the issues in priority order? If not, and it really doesn't sound like we do, then any discussion that leads to one is entirely appropriate in any project, and there is no reason anyone should be demotivated by it. Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
