On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:19:25 +0100, you wrote:
>>> >Here's an alternative scheme: Songs would be inserted under:
>>> >
>>> > {provider's public key}/{artist}/{title}
>>> >
>>> >Anyone is allowed to put either a white or black "reputation token" on a pr
>>ovi
>>> >der under:
>>> >
>>> > {provider's public key}/{rater's public key}
>OK, looked at it. Sorry for knocking back your idea, Andrew. I would still
>prefer a distributed moderation system to subspaces moderated by a single
>provider (or a small group of providers sharing a key). But if I can't make
>distributed moderation fly I'll have a look at trusted providers.
Actually, a slight modification is needed. Reputation tokens should all go under
{provider's public key}/{Reputation}/{rater's public key}
I was intending this to be distributed moderation. *Anyone* would be allowed to
insert a reputation token under the
{provider's public key}/{Reputation}/ subspace. So, if I had just downloaded
{Michael ROGERS}/{Metallica}/{Bunny Torture.mp3} and was pissed that I had just
been tricked into downloading a nursery
rhyme, I'd insert a black token under {Michael ROGERS}/{Reputation}/{Andy
Tepper} to publicly state that "Andy Tepper
thinks Michael ROGERS's reputation should be punished."
It would be up to the client to interpret the collection of tokens.
Of course, the subspace permission language is needed for all of this.
Andy
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
