Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > On Monday 19 May 2008 18:02, Julien Cornuwel wrote: >> Matthew Toseland a ?crit : >> >>> Thoughts? IMHO backups are an important feature, and they'd probably have > to >>> be hot backups for our usage... but then, not corrupting on running out of >>> disk space is important too! >> I just rewrote the WoT plugin to use db4o and I must say I like it. My >> code is much cleaner and I can focus on my classes without worrying >> about the database schema. Because requests are a must-have for my use, >> I don't think I can use perst :/ >> >> If you choose to use Perst, do you think it would be possible to keep >> db4o in freenet-ext.jar ? > > Most likely we will be using db4o for Freenet itself. You will be able to > create a separate database for your plugin.
That sounds good. > Nextgens tells me that you are having problems with the plugin API - please > let me know if you need any help. I had. At the beginning when I was using Derby. The problem was about my code being unable to load derby. I had to add derby.jar to the wrapper.conf. Anyway, my new code is not yet a plugin. I try to have it working standalone too. But thanks for your offer. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080520/2381ae45/attachment.pgp>
