Florent Daigni?re skrev: >> I'd argue for a default autorun status of "off" though, and instead make >> "on" the default on the relevant wizard page, along with a short >> description of advantages/consequences of autorun'ing Freenet. >> > > Here you are just being silly... but let's address that on the other > thread: > http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20081126.001810.5c2fe629.en.html >
Silly? I disagree. Giving the user the choice to decide over how his own system runs doesn't seem silly to me at all. Not automatically autorunning without the user's accept to do so seems like the proper way (even though much software goes against that practice). Informing about the performance consequences really is in place too, even if it causes some user to disable the autorun. Or not? - Zero3
