Florent Daigni?re skrev: > * Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> [2008-11-26 20:51:14]: > > >> Florent Daigni?re skrev: >> >>>> I'd argue for a default autorun status of "off" though, and instead >>>> make "on" the default on the relevant wizard page, along with a short >>>> description of advantages/consequences of autorun'ing Freenet. >>>> >>>> >>> Here you are just being silly... but let's address that on the other >>> thread: >>> http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20081126.001810.5c2fe629.en.html >>> >>> >> Silly? I disagree. Giving the user the choice to decide over how his own >> system runs doesn't seem silly to me at all. Not automatically >> autorunning without the user's accept to do so seems like the proper way >> (even though much software goes against that practice). >> > > The aim was to reduce the number of questions we ask during the > installation to a minimum: on the basis that advanced users can change > the settings they need afterwards, including whether the node > auto-starts or not. > >
Indeed, yet that is one of the questions you probably *ought* to ask. >> Informing about >> the performance consequences really is in place too, even if it causes >> some user to disable the autorun. Or not? >> > > "parse error" > ? - Zero3
