On Saturday 17 January 2009 23:50, svenerichoffmann at gmx.de wrote: > I think the only "real" solution to guarantee safety > is a dedicated freenet browser.
Isn't that what I just said? > > Trying to control the behaviour and safety of standard browsers > is serious problematic. As Webmaster i know how much information > can be gained from visitors. > > A dedicated browser would also give full control about timings > and how much connections to fproxy are made. Exactly, we cannot just ask the user to create a separate browser profile. WE NEED TO DO IT FOR THEM. That means either reinstating the firefox profile or building something new. Hopefully saces' work on wxWebkit will be a solution. > > I think having a taskbar icon siganalizing that freenet service is runing > and giving some options to configure freenet while runing and offering > to start the "freenet" browser would be fine and convinient thing. Everyone agrees we need a systray icon. Nobody has time to implement it right now. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090119/6f8159c4/attachment.pgp>
