On Sunday 18 January 2009 17:54, Zero3 wrote: > Daniel Cheng skrev: > > Maybe we should try the another way round: detect if the user use the > > same browser > > for other web sites and issue a big fat warning for this. > > > > Oh, the sweet irony in us using the same exploit to test if user has > visited http://www.google.com/, http://www.ebay.com/, > http://www.bbc.co.uk/, etc.. :P
Nonetheless it's not reliable. IMHO not a robust solution. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090119/e20578be/attachment.pgp>
