On Monday 12 Mar 2012 01:01:59 Ximin Luo wrote: > On 11/03/12 23:11, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Sunday 11 Mar 2012 22:07:08 Nicolas Hernandez wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> after lots of internal fights the choice is made. Let's go for GWT. > > > > This will cost us a large proportion of our core userbase. Alienating your > > core users is a cardinal sin. > > > > This prophecy is a little unrealistic, let's see what the end result actually > is before criticising it. > > Nicolas - can you describe your reasoning behind your decision? Why not e.g. > Apache Wicket?
I'm sorry, the framework doesn't matter, what matters is that there is an HTML-no-js version, and it seems that this is planned, even though Nicolas is proposing to use GWT. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120312/43a28ffd/attachment.pgp>
